What might be less appreciated in both cars is the quality of some of the plastics – those used around the lower part of the dash in particular feel rather hard and scratchy. The Captur’s raised driving position (as with other crossovers) goes down well with buyers, and gives a better view of the road ahead than the Clio. The steering wheel design, instrument binnacle and heating controls are interchangeable, along with many other smaller components. Like the outside, moving from the cabin of the Clio to the Captur (or vice versa) reveals many familiar touches. The Clio looks more squat and sporty – especially at the rear, while touches like the optional contrasting roof and extra flashes of chrome-effect trim helps give the Captur some added character. Other cues, like the curvy side sills and a window line that sweeps upwards towards the rear of the car, are present on both. This is most obvious at the front, where the pair flaunt a very similar grille featuring a large Renault badge in the centre. With both cars originating from the same brand, it isn’t surprising to see a number of similarities between the two designs. Put either the Renault Captur or the Renault Clio in our car configurator to see how much carwow could help you save. So if the choice was yours, would you choose the Clio or the Captur? We’re comparing the two to help you decide. The fourth generation Clio has continued where its predecessors left off, while the Captur has opened up a new segment for the brand. Two of the largest reasons (albeit two of the smallest in stature) are the pair of cars you see here. Since 2012, the brand has seen a 14 per cent increase in sales year-on-year – well above the market average. Renault has gone through something of a rejuvenation in recent times.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |